Communications
and PR

Find out how JMC helps your organization thrive in the new era...
start

Archive for the ‘Advertising’ Category

Obama Overexposure for Health Care Reform? Naa! It’s All About Frequency

Monday, September 21st, 2009 by John Mallen

11-21-09 NYTIn marketing frequency holds a lofty position as a key factor for effectiveness. Frequency is  the number of times a consumer needs to see your ad before they recall an buy.

I mention this because on September 20th virtually every pundit I’ve heard has hinted that President Obama may suffer from overexposure. 

Following a number of news conferences since January, multiple appearances on television interview programs, the President appeared on five different public affairs shows yesterday, and tonight he appears on David Letterman.

Of course all of this aligns with his goal of selling comprehensive health insurance reform.

The question of overexposure has to do with a struggle of the Mainstream Media to understand their own roles in an era of sea change in media and communications.  No longer is MSM the interpreter of developments for us - - at least in this case.

President Obama is using the MSM as an advertising media, speaking directly to the citizenry.  Not once, not twice … But clearly as he delivers consistent messages that are successively relayed on these networks and by other media who cover the President’s every major action.

So how many times do you have to repeat the message to get people to buy? At least three, but maybe seven, 17  if you are on line and, well, maybe up to 20 times.  These stats are well explained by Aussie blogger Bryan Ong in “A Marketing Blog by Marketing Journal” in a great 2006 post and another in 2007

My take?  What’s in play is an PR campaign driving frequency for the President’s main points.  He doesn’t need to buy air time.  But the message is direct from the country’s CEO to his electorate  ( who in turn can place extraordinary pressure on the directors, that is to say Congress)

What’s the message for those of us in the ” real world” of tight budgets, scarce resources and limited time?  The answer is more than the enduring value of frequency itself.  Even more  significant in the President’s campaign is an underlying two-step strategy. Get the out in your voice, accurately.  Then let it go viral.

To take the message public, perhaps you and I cannot command time on Sunday public affairs programs.   But you and I can publish on the Web in our own voice and with accuracy.  And we can take it viral.  I’ll post more on the Web opportunities in a future blog.

 Image from The New York Times, Sept. 21, 2009

Whoosh! Blogs go mainstream. Facebook becomes ghost town?

Friday, May 1st, 2009 by John Mallen

ghost-town

Behold the rate of change in the media.  This afternoon’s breaking news from PRSA: blogs are now mainstream media (MSM). Meanwhile, Business Week this week posts a scenario projecting a possibility that Facebook.com’s  open-source move could end up siphoning its ad revenues turning the site into a ghost town.

Blogs

Blogs now reach tens of millions in this country and both readers and creators are growing, says e-marketer.comannouncing its $695 report. “Currently, 96.6 million US Internet users read a blog at least once per month, representing 48.5% of the Internet population. By 2013, 128.2 million people, or 58% of all US users, will take part.”  And bloggers, those posting at least monthly, will increase from 27.9 million to 37.6 million in the next five years, adds e-marketer.com.

Facebook

BW’s  The Tech Beat commentary suggests that in opening parts of its code to developers, the popular social marketing site could see revenues decline when the thousands of new apps allow users to tap into Facebook without going to its homepage where its ads now live.

Not so dark. “it appears that the company is planning to replace the revenues it will lose from banner ads with a new type of revenue: in-stream ads, which would appear alongside status updates and other ‘news stories’, even on third-party apps,” says BW writer Douglas MacMillan .

Banner ads on Facebook’s home page are really old fashioned “interruption marketing” whereas in-stream text ads are part of the search experience.

Both the mainlining of blogs and the possible in-stream ads in Facebook are much more than change. They’re enormous opportunity for marketers.

Photo: John Holm (foto 3116 Flickr.com)

How to drive business development for small business

Friday, January 30th, 2009 by John Mallen

How do you drive business development for your small business?

There are numerous sources of business ideas. Many are excellent and proven. I want to bring your attention on one tool we all use — but too often left to fend on its own — communications.  Call it advertising, promotion, public relations (PR) or anythiong else. But all of these are in the communications bucket. In small business (and often larger ones) communications is the empty seat at the leadership table. But it is a powerful success enabler.

“Okay,” you say, “let’s get out there and run some ads.” Let’s get a promotion going.” Not necessarily bad, not necessarily good either. What you need to start is a business strategy which is well-supported by a communications strategy. Let’s take it by the numbers.

First — be clear about your business strategy. If you have been moving along from one year to the next, stop. Take stock of where you stand, what you want to achieve and how you will get there. All this sets the foundation.

Second – market research. This can be as simple as listening well to customers or asking questions of customers and prospective and listening to their answers. Market research could be results of a highly sophisticated study conducted by your trade association. It could be as basic as having your people ask a similar set of questions of everyone they deal with for a period of time, and systematically analyzing what they say. Research means understanding the context of your market, the dynamics affecting behavoirs and the impressions shaping opinions about your firm or the future.

Third — explore how communications can work in the marketing environment to accelerate your organization’s stratgegy and its progress toward realizing your goals. Central to success here means stepping away from tendencey to type cast marketing communications, and in, “Let’s get out there and run some ads.” Ads to do what?   Knock on the door of your customers’ attention to get awareness, share of mind, or generate traffic. Understanding how communications can contgribute to your business strategy means setting communications goals and developing a strategy for communications — all in support of the business growth plan.

Fourth — do it. Create an affordable, executable plan of action. Using one communications tool effectively is far superior to using a set of tools that fail to achieve, because you cannot achieve the frequency needed, or they don’t reach the right people, or any of dozens of reasons these efforts so often fail.

The greatest cause of failure is the fixation on the tools that we personally understand and find appealing versus the tools needed to drive the strategy — if there is indeed any strategy at all.  These four steps can be extremely difficult to execute with any discipline, especially when you’re taken with the daily challenges of running your business. Being so close to your business does not provide the vantage you need to move effectively from step one to implementation. If you can, it would pay you to enlist the support of a professional or a small brain trust of advisors to help you set the course.

The most citical professional support initially is not the development of an ad or drafting of your press releases. These skills will make sense, but only once you have identified a strategic plan for communications. In many cases, it would be preferable to execuite simply so long as it is focused and sustainable. By this I mean having one well-targeted promotion, or driving awareness through one well-aimed direct marketing ad campaign.

Communications is one means of driving devbelopment for your small business. Following these steps will ensure that whatever communications you deploy drive success.

Print Aweigh

Friday, April 18th, 2008 by admin

March 17 — It is changing. This morning one of our regional weekly business journals reported that the Journal Register Company (NYSE: JRC), publisher of our only daily paper as well as 26 other dailies and 327 other non dailies is facing tough times. Earlier this month they hired Lazard Freres to help devise a financial strategy and received a delisting notice from the New York Stock Exchange. Then I see a feature in The Drudge Report about an earnings loss by The New York Times for the quarter –”one of the worst periods the company and the newspaper industry have seen,” the paper said. Browsing through blogs in the evening, I realized that I was as much in blogs as in mainstream media (MSM). One of them, On Line Spin’s David Morgan predicts a tough four years ahead for the newspaper business.

He wanders into a future where the hometown paper is gone, where weeklies emerge to fill the gap for local business advertising and to some degree the thirst for news. he anticipates a death spiral of offline media which must support huge overhead. And he sees their demise as an opportunity for backfilling.

Someone will have to create a vehicle for the free-standing inserts and what will local businesses do but look for media replacements to carry the in-your-face promotions.

My point is not to repeat what is being covered so well. My point is that those who need to market should be moving into the new media. The groundswell is underway as attested to by the dismal financial news.

Differentiate? Or What?

Sunday, March 30th, 2008 by admin

Differentiation has become a holy grail in PR and branding. It’s evangelized most fervently in Differentiate or Die: Survival in our Era of Killer Competition, by Jack Trout and Steve Rivkin, published in 2000 and now reissued in its second edition.

I like Jack Trout’s work and like many in the communications business, I love touting how my client’s offering stands apart from everyone else! To what degree is it different? Does that even matter? Does the difference have that much to do with the value proposition? Not all the time.

For a fresh view of differentiation, take a look at Matt Kurchaski’s blog Define or Differentiate? A Marketer’s Dilemma. “Too many companies ask the question “how can we be different” when they should be asking ‘what does the customer want and how can we deliver better than the other guys?’. ” Matt offers a crisp summary of a thoughtful article by Eric M. Morgenstern, APR, Fellow PRSA just published by The Counselors Academy, which is part of the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA). The full text is available for purchase through the PRSA.

There’s a lot to think about here. It’s, well, different.

Marketing in the Media: Mix it up

Friday, February 29th, 2008 by admin

I recently spent a pleasant afternoon with an entrepreneurial team here in the New York’s Hudson Valley. They are about to launch a revolutionary health care practice. As in the past, I found myself talking about how important it is to use a variety of media vehicles tuned to audience segments and buying habits.

I heard myself imploring this team. “You cannot rely on publicity alone! You need to have a mix that will reach your prospective patients, touch what they’re interested in, and do this over time.

The same day, in a story about two recent research reports, eMarketer newsletter said essentially the same thing. The newsletter covers Vertis-commissioned “Retail 2008: Media” study, conducted by Marshall Marketing & Communications. It also covers the BIGresearch study the media that influence purchases.

“Depending on who is being targeted, when, and at which stage of the consumer buying process, a range of media could be considered most effective. The popularity and influence of different media can also change over time. A few recent studies illustrate this point.”

Continues eMarketer “…it is easy to lapse into complacency when considering the best media for a campaign. Given that the ‘best media’ change both over time and depending on the types of goods being marketed, it is important to keep current on those media.”

This is sound advice, whether you’re working with top-tier ad and communications budgets or if you’re an entrepreneur planning to bootstrap your new big idea.

That means selecting among print, radio, television, Web 2.0, direct, outdoor, event marketing as well as other vehicles. I fact it’s a lot like what I told the team with which I was meeting. Indeed, it was a great conversation.

“So what you want to do is, in a nutshell, ‘ Get ready, aim, and fire using strategically selected media, I said triumphantly.

“We just want to fire,” said the host.

Must be why this message of using a range of media gets repeated so often.

Social Media Rocks

Wednesday, November 28th, 2007 by John Mallen

Corporate leaders have a sharp eye on social media when it comes to driving success. 

ClearlyMaple_leaves, with Internet developments we are in a sea change when it comes to communications. Senior execs see that change approaching. Just today, a survey report from Toronto-based Veritas Communications reported that senior execs (85 percent) believe social media like Facebook, You Tube, and blogs are becoming essential to communications. Nearly half (46 percent) say social media tools are becoming even more important than television, radio, newspapers and magazines.

"It is astounding that one in two executives say social media is becoming even more important than television," says Keith McArthur, principal of com.motion and Senior Director of Media Innovation at the Veritas group. "TV advertising," he says, "is still where marketers spend most of their money, while social media represents a tiny sliver of the budget. It’s clear that’s going to change." The results are contained in a survey of 444 business and marketing leaders conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights. The survey was conducted in Canada.

Have specialists in communication provided corporate leaders with the strategic insights and tactical planning they need to win elections and maintain success?

Stay tuned.

Use New Media to Listen? Great Idea!

Tuesday, September 18th, 2007 by John Mallen

Early in my career, I recall a great corporate ad campaign that urged all of us to give more attention to listening. Sadly, I don’t remember the company, or the aesthetics, but I do recall the campaign. Some years later, I recall reading how Jack Welch, then CEO of General Electric, emphasizing the same in his executive seminars.

Of great interest are two recent blogs calling on us to remember to use the power of social media to, yup, listen.

It is not that marketing and sales don’t listen, but we have developed strong habits for how we listen. In my office, we’re discussing yet another focus group for a project. On another project, we at JMC are recommending a survey. And for a third client we’re deep in the trenches mining data that will be followed by what we call Soundings Research. All of this is good.

But I also like the reminder that we should consider new communications as a tool for listening to the publics in addition to being vehicles for communicating to and dialoging with our groups. I saw this mentioned in Jennifer Laycock’s blog in Search Engine Guide, and followed her to The Buzz Saw blog from Bill Balderaz.

Now we have to learn how to listen effectively!

PR Blogging Ethics -Salute to Ogilvy PR

Sunday, September 9th, 2007 by John Mallen

My intent in this blog is perhaps a slight bit different than that of many other in the PR and Marketing Communications world. The aim here is to present information mainly for the generalist manager and business owner, identifying the power and potential of communications as a tool that can leverage everything else they are doing and, in turn, help drive success. In other words it is not intended to be another resource for professional PR, advertising and kindred professionals.

But I step aside from the generalist perspective to salute Ogilvy PR for developing a code of ethics designed to guide those of us who are professional communicators in our dealings with bloggers. I noticed the alert this evening in a post by Ed Cotton at InfluxInsights, who relays a post by Karl Long at Experience Curve. The original was posted Thursday on Ogilvy’s  360 Digital Influemce Blog. The Ogilvy tenets are a Beta list for discussion and subsequent refinement.

It arrives at the right time. Ed Cotton’s asksthe ad community, “Who is going after the bloggers first - media planners or PR?” The important point is not that PR may be leading advertising this time around, but rather that bloggers may well find themselves even more overwhelmed as the entire communications infrastructure reaches to them. Does anyone else remember the noise that erupted with CB radio?

The long-tail value of micro-segments than are becoming attractive market targets can mean an increase  in the caucaphony of of voices pitching the bloggers who serve these micro communities of interest, It is not jst just publicists but potentially media buyers and maybe even others of us who working in the “markeing mix.” Bloggers are clearly a very tempting SPAM target.

PR people have some level of etiquette training. For how many years now have journalists, appearing as panelists at innumerable conferences advised (pleaded?) with the forever refreshed crop of PR pratitioners to “please read the publication [see the TV show, hear the radio program, etc...],” to “understand” what it is we cover!  Please don’t think casting bread upon the water will see your item miracuously appear?” Today we’d call that spamming the media. It doesn’t work with the media nor with bloggers for the same reason.

What I like about PR driving the bus versus advertising is that — when we practice what we have learned –we can keep our relations with bloggers personal, that is aimed to meet their needs. What I like about Ogilvy PR’s Outreach Code of Ethics is that we can keep the process respectful.