Communications
and PR

Find out how JMC helps your organization thrive in the new era...
start

Posts Tagged ‘Advertising’

Obama Overexposure for Health Care Reform? Naa! It’s All About Frequency

Monday, September 21st, 2009 by John Mallen

11-21-09 NYTIn marketing frequency holds a lofty position as a key factor for effectiveness. Frequency is  the number of times a consumer needs to see your ad before they recall an buy.

I mention this because on September 20th virtually every pundit I’ve heard has hinted that President Obama may suffer from overexposure. 

Following a number of news conferences since January, multiple appearances on television interview programs, the President appeared on five different public affairs shows yesterday, and tonight he appears on David Letterman.

Of course all of this aligns with his goal of selling comprehensive health insurance reform.

The question of overexposure has to do with a struggle of the Mainstream Media to understand their own roles in an era of sea change in media and communications.  No longer is MSM the interpreter of developments for us - - at least in this case.

President Obama is using the MSM as an advertising media, speaking directly to the citizenry.  Not once, not twice … But clearly as he delivers consistent messages that are successively relayed on these networks and by other media who cover the President’s every major action.

So how many times do you have to repeat the message to get people to buy? At least three, but maybe seven, 17  if you are on line and, well, maybe up to 20 times.  These stats are well explained by Aussie blogger Bryan Ong in “A Marketing Blog by Marketing Journal” in a great 2006 post and another in 2007

My take?  What’s in play is an PR campaign driving frequency for the President’s main points.  He doesn’t need to buy air time.  But the message is direct from the country’s CEO to his electorate  ( who in turn can place extraordinary pressure on the directors, that is to say Congress)

What’s the message for those of us in the ” real world” of tight budgets, scarce resources and limited time?  The answer is more than the enduring value of frequency itself.  Even more  significant in the President’s campaign is an underlying two-step strategy. Get the out in your voice, accurately.  Then let it go viral.

To take the message public, perhaps you and I cannot command time on Sunday public affairs programs.   But you and I can publish on the Web in our own voice and with accuracy.  And we can take it viral.  I’ll post more on the Web opportunities in a future blog.

 Image from The New York Times, Sept. 21, 2009

Sunday, February 15th, 2009 by John Mallen

social-media-todayWhat does the sea change in the use of media mean for the future of media and communications to people in the market?  I found on Social Media Today  some comments worth paying attention to. 

 

The notes about media are from  just one of 10 categories in Richard Edelman’s blog summarizing his experience at Davos.  Here are the points (lifted directly).

  • Distribution is the new hot area (YouTube is now the #2 search vehicle); content, which was king, now is not.
  • There is expectation of free content, which may well mean more consumer-generated and aggregated material improved by democratization. Media companies must provide a “live” experience, allowing more continuous updates.
  • Subscription models, such as Thomson Reuters, only work because they are aiming at professionals with inelastic demand for high-grade material at their fingertips.
  • The display model for advertising is broken; the ad agencies need to find better ways to reach specific audiences through more targeted, measured advertising.

Richard concludes his post, saying he leaves Davos “convinced of the centrality of public relations to the rebuilding of confidence in companies and government.” Here PR appears to be equated with having credible messengers educating the masses. 

No argument here, being that our firm is a micro version of Edelman, “the leading independent global PR firm.” I also believe that in its larger context PR has an exciting role to play in energizing a new world of free, multi-media, two-way conversations that will replace the paid, push advertising model of the past. 

Meanwhile the points above are really worth giving some thought.

Marketing in the Media: Mix it up

Friday, February 29th, 2008 by admin

I recently spent a pleasant afternoon with an entrepreneurial team here in the New York’s Hudson Valley. They are about to launch a revolutionary health care practice. As in the past, I found myself talking about how important it is to use a variety of media vehicles tuned to audience segments and buying habits.

I heard myself imploring this team. “You cannot rely on publicity alone! You need to have a mix that will reach your prospective patients, touch what they’re interested in, and do this over time.

The same day, in a story about two recent research reports, eMarketer newsletter said essentially the same thing. The newsletter covers Vertis-commissioned “Retail 2008: Media” study, conducted by Marshall Marketing & Communications. It also covers the BIGresearch study the media that influence purchases.

“Depending on who is being targeted, when, and at which stage of the consumer buying process, a range of media could be considered most effective. The popularity and influence of different media can also change over time. A few recent studies illustrate this point.”

Continues eMarketer “…it is easy to lapse into complacency when considering the best media for a campaign. Given that the ‘best media’ change both over time and depending on the types of goods being marketed, it is important to keep current on those media.”

This is sound advice, whether you’re working with top-tier ad and communications budgets or if you’re an entrepreneur planning to bootstrap your new big idea.

That means selecting among print, radio, television, Web 2.0, direct, outdoor, event marketing as well as other vehicles. I fact it’s a lot like what I told the team with which I was meeting. Indeed, it was a great conversation.

“So what you want to do is, in a nutshell, ‘ Get ready, aim, and fire using strategically selected media, I said triumphantly.

“We just want to fire,” said the host.

Must be why this message of using a range of media gets repeated so often.